A Discussion on Prominent Sustainability Reporting Standards and Their Unique Focuses
In today’s business landscape, the narrative is changing from a profit-focused approach to doing business to a more inclusive value-creation approach for all stakeholders. Companies are expected to behave as responsible citizens, and there are increasing demands for companies to communicate what they are doing on sustainability to stakeholders. Primarily, different stakeholders expect different things from the organization. For example, a shareholder wants better returns or dividends, while a host community wants an environment free from pollution and social goods. This distinction in the requirements of different stakeholders has brought about the proliferation of varying sustainability reporting standards.
Sustainability has become a key consideration for organizations worldwide. As companies strive to integrate sustainability into their operations, they often rely on prominent sustainability reporting standards to guide their reporting practices. This article aims to provide a comprehensive discussion on some of the most widely recognized sustainability standards, including the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), and the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). By understanding the unique focuses of these standards, businesses can effectively communicate their sustainability performance and contribute to a more sustainable future.
The GRI is one of the most widely adopted sustainability reporting frameworks globally. It provides guidelines for reporting on various sustainability topics, including environmental, social, and governance (ESG) aspects. The GRI framework emphasizes integrating sustainability into core business strategies and disclosing material sustainability issues. By adhering to the GRI standards, organizations can enhance transparency, accountability, and comparability in their sustainability reporting. Essentially, the GRI is focused on impact materiality reporting. The GRI expects the organization to determine its material topics and disclose the methodology to achieve the results. Broadly, GRI is the most widely used reporting framework and is generally considered suited for all stakeholder groups.
https://www.measurabl.com/the-top-five-sustainability-reporting-frameworks-you-should-know/
The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB): The SASB focuses on industry-specific sustainability reporting standards. It recognizes that different industries face unique sustainability challenges and, therefore, requires companies to disclose material sustainability issues specific to their industry. The SASB standards provide a comprehensive set of metrics and disclosures that enable organizations to report on financially material ESG factors. By aligning with the SASB standards, businesses can effectively communicate their sustainability performance within the context of their industry. The SASB reporting standard is about an organization disclosing financial and material information to its stakeholders. It provides the SASB materiality map and various industry standards to report in line with its standard.
The TCFD focuses specifically on climate-related financial disclosures. It provides a framework for organizations to assess and disclose climate-related risks and opportunities. The TCFD framework encourages companies to disclose information related to governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets. By adopting the TCFD recommendations, organizations can enhance their understanding of climate-related risks and opportunities, improve decision-making processes, and demonstrate their commitment to addressing climate change.
While these sustainability standards have a unique focus, they are not mutually exclusive. They often complement each other in providing a comprehensive view of an organization’s sustainability performance. The GRI framework emphasizes various sustainability topics and encourages organizations to disclose material issues across multiple dimensions. The SASB standards, on the other hand, provide industry-specific guidance, enabling companies to report on financially material ESG factors that are most relevant to their industry. The TCFD framework focuses on climate-related risks and opportunities, providing a structured approach to assessing and disclosing climate-related information. By considering the unique focuses of these standards and adopting a holistic approach, organizations can offer a comprehensive and meaningful representation of their sustainability performance.
To meet the needs of different stakeholders, organizations sometimes adopt some of these standards and can align their reporting using the common requirements of the standards. However, formally reporting in line with these standards may require formally notifying the organization to fulfill all due diligence. The common trend in reporting is the use of GRI standards and aligning other standard disclosures.
In conclusion, it is important to use the right standard to communicate and disclose progress on sustainability efforts to the stakeholders.
Thank you for reading!
